Who Was Roger Ebert? The Legendary Critic, His Reviews, and Legacy

Q: Who Was Roger Ebert and Why Does He Still Matter?

Roger Ebert wasn't just a reviewer; he was a phenomenon who transformed film criticism by making it accessible to everyone. His clear, passionate writing connected with general audiences, explaining complex film concepts in an easy-to-understand manner. Starting at the Chicago Sun-Times in 1967, he became the first film critic to win the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism in 1975. His national fame grew with the TV show 'Siskel & Ebert,' where their iconic 'two thumbs up' rating system became a cultural touchstone, cementing his status as a trusted guide for moviegoers.

Q: Did Siskel and Ebert get along?

On screen, Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel's relationship was famously combative. Viewers enjoyed their spirited and passionate disagreements on shows like 'Siskel & Ebert & The Movies,' where their debates often turned into full-blown arguments. This on-screen dynamic, where one critic might champion a film while the other tore it down, became iconic and created must-watch entertainment.

Roger Ebert (1942-2013) was an American film critic, journalist, and screenwriter, widely regarded as one of the most influential critics of his time. He was the first film critic to win the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism and was best known for his work on the television show ‘Siskel & Ebert,’ where he and Gene Siskel popularized the ‘two thumbs up’ rating system for movie reviews.

Ever found yourself scrolling through countless movie options, wondering which one is truly worth your precious time? Before the age of Rotten Tomatoes and YouTube explainers, one voice cut through the noise, guiding film lovers toward cinematic gems and away from the duds. That voice belonged to Roger Ebert—a name synonymous with sharp wit, profound insight, and an unshakeable passion for the silver screen. For decades, he was more than a critic; he was a trusted companion on our cinematic journey, shaping how an entire generation thought about movies.

Here at IWatchMovies Blog, we believe understanding the foundations of film is as important as keeping up with the latest hits. That’s why today, we’re diving into the extraordinary life and career of Roger Ebert. We’ll explore how he redefined film criticism, from his Pulitzer Prize-winning ebert reviews to his iconic partnership with Gene Siskel. Together, they formed the legendary—and often fiery—duo known as Siskel and Ebert. Join us to discover the magic behind his famous four-star ratings and learn why his Roger Ebert reviews continue to influence film lovers today.

Who Was Roger Ebert and Why Does He Still Matter?

The Critic Who Changed Cinema

Ever wonder why some movie critics resonate more than others? Roger Ebert wasn’t just a reviewer; he was a phenomenon who transformed the way we talk about film. Before Ebert, film criticism often felt exclusive and academic, but he broke down those barriers, making it accessible to everyone.

His approach was simple yet profound, characterized by a clarity and passion that connected with general audiences. By explaining complex film concepts in an easy-to-understand manner, his roger ebert reviews became a trusted resource. Ultimately, he changed cinema by inviting everyone into the conversation.

Furthermore, Ebert’s enthusiasm for movies was infectious. He encouraged millions to think more deeply about what they watched, celebrating great filmmaking while challenging subpar work. His unique voice shaped a generation of movie lovers and continues to inspire aspiring critics.

From Pulitzer Prize to Household Name

Roger Ebert’s journey to becoming a household name was remarkable. Beginning his career as a film critic for the Chicago Sun-Times in 1967, his insightful writing quickly gained national attention. In 1975, he achieved a groundbreaking milestone by becoming the first—and to date, only—film critic to win the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism ^[1], an award that cemented his reputation.

However, it was television that launched him into true national prominence. In 1975, he began co-hosting “Sneak Previews” alongside Gene Siskel, a show that later evolved into “Siskel & Ebert.” This program made siskel and ebert a cultural touchstone, and their famous “two thumbs up” or “two thumbs down” rating system became iconic, introducing nuanced ebert reviews to millions of homes weekly.

Consequently, Roger Ebert became a beloved and instantly recognizable figure. He transcended the role of critic to become a trusted guide for moviegoers everywhere. His journey from respected journalist to television personality demonstrated his incredible appeal and broad influence.

The Siskel and Ebert Era: Two Thumbs Up

Ever wonder why some movie critics resonate more than others? Roger Ebert wasn’t just a reviewer; he was a phenomenon who transformed the way we talk about film. Before Ebert, the world of film critics and publications often felt exclusive and academic, but he broke down those barriers, making it accessible to everyone.

Did Siskel and Ebert get along?

A Complex On-Screen Rivalry

Many wondered if legendary critics Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel truly got along. On screen, their relationship was famously combative, and viewers loved their spirited disagreements, which were a hallmark of shows like Siskel & Ebert & The Movies. Their debates were so passionate that they often became full-blown arguments.

This iconic on-screen dynamic made for engaging television. As they debated countless movie reviews with gusto, one critic might champion a film while the other tore it down, creating must-watch entertainment. Ultimately, their rivalry made film criticism more accessible by bringing movie discussions into millions of homes ^[2].

While their disputes sometimes bordered on the petty, at other times their differing tastes truly shone. For instance, Siskel often preferred more artistic cinema, whereas Ebert had a wider appreciation for genres and frequently defended popular blockbusters. This clash of perspectives was the very thing that fueled their legendary chemistry and was all part of the show.

A Deep Off-Screen Friendship

However, away from the camera, a different story unfolded. While their on-screen rivalry was largely for entertainment—and certainly drew in viewers—Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel were genuinely close friends. Off-set, their interactions were vastly different, built on a deep mutual respect for each other’s critical insights.

The two spoke frequently outside of work, and their conversations centered not only on films but also on personal stories. This friendship remained largely private for years, only becoming public after Siskel‘s passing in 1999. At that point, Ebert began to speak openly about their deep bond ^[3].

In his moving tributes, Ebert recalled their shared experiences and intense film discussions, emphasizing how immensely he valued Siskel‘s insight. He often wrote about feeling incomplete without Siskel, explaining that their rivalry pushed them both to excel because it was built on a foundation of strong friendship and genuine care for one another.

What was Roger Ebert diagnosed with?

His Courageous Battle with Cancer

In 2002, the renowned film critic Roger Ebert faced a profound challenge with a diagnosis of thyroid cancer, marking the start of a difficult health journey.

Just one year later, in 2003, Ebert received a second, more aggressive diagnosis of salivary gland cancer, which led to multiple complex surgeries ^[4].

These extensive procedures, aimed at removing the cancerous growths, sadly came with significant consequences.

Due to the cancer, surgeons removed his lower jaw. As a result, Ebert lost the ability to speak and could no longer eat or drink normally.

Despite these immense physical setbacks, Ebert remained incredibly resilient. His spirit and love for movies never wavered, and his personal struggle became a public testament to his courage.

Losing His Voice, But Not His Words

While losing his voice was a devastating blow for a public figure like Roger Ebert, it did not silence his critical insight. Instead, he found new ways to share his thoughts.

Embracing technology, Ebert used text-to-speech software to communicate publicly, which allowed him to engage with audiences once more.

His prolific writing also continued. Ebert kept penning his famous ebert reviews for the Chicago Sun-Times and actively contributed to his influential website, RogerEbert.com.

His continued work took several forms:

He published several books, including memoirs and collections of his film critiques.
Ebert maintained an active blog where he shared personal reflections and opinions on a wide range of topics.
He attended film festivals globally, where his presence at events like Cannes and Telluride was a powerful symbol.
He even appeared on television, usually through pre-recorded segments using his synthesized voice.

His unwavering dedication to film criticism inspired many, proving that a passion for storytelling could overcome any obstacle. His ability to adapt ensured his roger ebert reviews continued to reach millions, cementing his enduring legacy in the world of cinema.

What was Roger Ebert’s favorite movie?

Pinpointing a single “favorite movie” for a critic as prolific as Roger Ebert is a complex task. Because his tastes evolved throughout his career, he often said his favorite film was simply “the one he was watching at the moment.” Despite this, several films held an enduring place in his heart and appeared frequently in his discussions of cinematic greatness.

For example, one film Ebert consistently cited as a monumental achievement was Citizen Kane (1941). He viewed it as a foundational text for film studies and a masterclass in storytelling, praising its innovative techniques and profound character study [source: rogerebert.com].

More Than Just One Masterpiece

Although Citizen Kane often topped “greatest” lists, Ebert’s personal affections spanned many genres and eras. His love for cinema was not limited to high art; he championed any film that moved, entertained, or challenged him. This philosophy is evident in his celebrated “Great Movies” collection, a living list of films he believed every cinephile should see. Some of his other frequently lauded films include:

Casablanca (1942): A timeless classic, Ebert celebrated its perfect script, memorable characters, and enduring romance. He called it “one of the greatest movies ever made” [source: rogerebert.com].
La Dolce Vita (1960): Federico Fellini’s epic portrayal of Roman society was a film Ebert returned to often, appreciating its scale and depth.
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968): In a famous display of his capacity for growth, Ebert recanted his initially negative review of Kubrick’s masterpiece. He later called it “a truly great film” and added it to his Great Movies list.
The Tree of Life (2011): In his later years, Terrence Malick’s contemplative film deeply affected him. He gave it four stars and wrote about its profound emotional impact.

Ultimately, Roger Ebert’s reviews reveal a deep appreciation for the entire spectrum of cinema. He believed the power of film lay in its ability to transport, educate, and create a powerful emotional connection with the audience. For Ebert, a “favorite” was never about a single title but about the ongoing journey of discovering cinematic excellence. More than anything, he simply loved movies.

What movies did Roger Ebert give 4 stars?

Understanding Ebert’s Four-Star Rating

When Roger Ebert awarded a movie a full four stars, it signified more than just a positive review—it was the mark of a true masterpiece. For Ebert, this rating was not about personal enjoyment; instead, it spoke to a film’s artistic excellence and lasting impact.

His rating system, which ranged from zero to four stars, was straightforward. However, the top tier was reserved for cinema that truly resonated with him—films that either pushed boundaries or perfectly executed their vision. He considered them essential viewing for any movie enthusiast.

A four-star review from Ebert signaled that a movie would likely stand the test of time, possessing significant cultural, emotional, or technical brilliance. This distinction was important, as he often differentiated between movies he simply liked and those he considered genuinely great.

A Look at His ‘Great Movies’ List

Ebert’s ultimate passion project was his “Great Movies” series, a collection dedicated to highlighting films of enduring value. He believed these were movies everyone should experience, and the ongoing list grew over many years, offering his profound insights.

While these selections often included films he had already given four stars, he also revisited older movies, reassessing their greatness in retrospect. As a result, the list spans various genres and eras, showcasing cinema’s rich history ^[5].

The “Great Movies” list was not static; it evolved throughout Ebert’s prolific career. Serving as a guide for cinephiles and casual viewers alike, its detailed essays provided valuable context for each entry.

Here are a few examples of films featured in his “Great Movies” series:

Citizen Kane (1941): Often cited as one of the greatest films ever made.
Casablanca (1942): A classic romance and wartime drama.
The Godfather (1972): A quintessential American crime saga.
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968): A landmark science fiction epic.
Apocalypse Now (1979): Francis Ford Coppola’s powerful war film.

Notable and Surprising Perfect Reviews

While Ebert’s four-star reviews often went to universally acclaimed classics like Singin’ in the Rain and La Dolce Vita, his broad tastes meant some less obvious choices also earned his highest praise. This appreciation for diverse cinematic experiences made his perspective unique.

His perfect scores weren’t reserved for art-house darlings; he recognized excellence across all genres. This approach made his reviews consistently engaging and encouraged readers to explore films outside their usual preferences.

Here are some notable four-star reviews from Roger Ebert:

Pulp Fiction (1994): Quentin Tarantino’s groundbreaking crime film. Ebert praised its clever dialogue and unique structure ^[6].
Evil Dead II (1987): A horror-comedy sequel that received perfect marks. Ebert admired its inventive special effects and over-the-top energy, demonstrating his openness to genre films.
Hoop Dreams (1994): A powerful documentary following two inner-city teenagers. Ebert called it a masterpiece, noting its profound look at life, race, and class in America.
Dark City (1998): A visually stunning sci-fi noir. Ebert championed this film, highlighting its ambitious ideas and striking atmosphere while seeing its cult potential early on.
Rushmore (1998): Wes Anderson’s quirky coming-of-age story. Ebert loved its unique characters and distinctive style, proving his appreciation for original voices in cinema.

Roger Ebert’s Lasting Legacy

The Influence of RogerEbert.com

Even after his passing, Roger Ebert’s voice lives on, and the website RogerEbert.com is a shining testament to this legacy. By curating his vast archive of Roger Ebert reviews—which includes decades of insightful and passionate writing—the site continues his mission to champion great cinema.

However, the site is more than just an archive. Featuring new reviews and articles daily, a dedicated team of talented critics contributes fresh perspectives while upholding Ebert’s high standards. This active curation ensures his legacy continues to thrive, and the site remains a vital hub for film discussion.

Key ways RogerEbert.com extends his influence include:

Preserving His Work: Making his thousands of ebert reviews accessible allows new generations to discover his insights.
New Voices: The site publishes current film criticism, bringing diverse viewpoints to the forefront.
The “Great Movies” Section: This popular feature continues his famous list by highlighting essential films from cinema history.
Community Engagement: It fosters a community of movie lovers who discuss films with passion and intelligence.

The Books That Captured His Voice

Roger Ebert was not only a prolific critic but also a celebrated author. His books offered deeper dives into his cinematic world and shared profound personal reflections, cementing his place in literary culture.

Some of his most beloved and influential books include:

The Great Movies (I, II, III, and IV): This series compiled his essays on films he considered timeless masterpieces. As essential reading for any cinephile, these books highlight his sharp analysis.
Life Itself: A Memoir: Published shortly before his death, this deeply moving autobiography offers an intimate look at his life, battles, and remarkable spirit.
I Hated, Hated, Hated This Movie: This collection of his most scathing ebert reviews proves his wit was just as sharp in disapproval and provides plenty of laughs.
Awake in the Dark: The Best of Roger Ebert: Spanning his long career, this collection features some of his most iconic writings and serves as a fantastic introduction to his genius.

By reaching wider audiences, these books offered more than just critiques; they provided a philosophy of film and life itself.

How He Continues to Influence Film Lovers Today

Roger Ebert’s impact stretches far beyond his writings, fundamentally shaping how we talk about movies. His legacy is deeply embedded in modern film criticism, teaching generations to appreciate film as an art form.

His enduring influence can be seen in several key areas:

Accessibility: Ebert made film criticism approachable by avoiding pretension and writing reviews that spoke directly to everyday moviegoers.
Emotional Connection: He emphasized the emotional power of film, and his reviews often focused on how a film made the audience feel.
The “Thumbs Up” Legacy: The iconic “Two Thumbs Up” from the Siskel and Ebert show remains legendary. This simple rating system became a universal shorthand for quality and demystified criticism for the public.
Advocacy for Film: Ebert consistently championed diverse cinema, including independent and international works, broadening the horizons for many viewers.
Mentorship: He inspired countless aspiring critics and encouraged thoughtful engagement with film. As a result, many current writers cite him as a primary influence.

Ultimately, Roger Ebert proved that film criticism matters because it enhances our movie-watching experience. His infectious passion and firm belief in cinema’s power to inform and transform continue to resonate with film lovers globally.

Frequently Asked Questions About Roger Ebert

What did Roger Ebert say before he died?

Roger Ebert’s final public words were deeply poignant, shared in his last blog post, “A Leave of Presence,” on April 2, 2013. In it, he announced a “slowdown” in his prolific writing due to a recurrence of cancer. He concluded with the powerful message: “Thank you for going on this adventure with me. I’ll see you at the movies.” ^[7]

Additionally, his wife, Chaz Ebert, later shared more intimate details about his final moments. She revealed that he was writing nearly until the end and reportedly typed “I love you” to her on his computer before he passed away peacefully.

What movie did both Siskel and Ebert rate #1 in 1972?

This is a great question with a surprising answer. In 1972, Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert did not choose the same movie for their #1 pick. At the time, they were critics for competing Chicago newspapers, and their iconic television show, “Sneak Previews” (later “Siskel & Ebert”), wouldn’t begin until 1975. As a result, they compiled their “best of the year” lists independently.

Here were their respective top films for 1972:

Roger Ebert’s #1 Film of 1972: Cabaret
Gene Siskel’s #1 Film of 1972: A Clockwork Orange

While both films were highly acclaimed and remain cinematic classics, the two critics simply had different individual preferences for the best film of that year ^[8].

What happened to Roger Ebert’s jaw?

Roger Ebert’s jaw was removed as part of his courageous battle with cancer. After a thyroid cancer diagnosis in 2002, he underwent a life-altering surgery in 2006 to treat salivary gland cancer. This extensive procedure required the removal of his lower jaw.

The surgery resulted in profound physical changes, leaving him unable to speak, eat, or drink normally. He communicated using a custom-made prosthetic jaw and a voice synthesizer. Despite these immense challenges, Ebert continued his prolific writing career, never letting his physical limitations diminish his passion for film criticism. His resilience became an inspiration to many people worldwide ^[9].